Riparian buffers are vegetated, often forested, areas (“strips”) adjacent to streams, rivers, lakes and other waterways protecting aquatic environments from the impacts of surrounding land use (Enanga et al. 2010). Use of riparian buffers to maintain water quality in streams and rivers is considered to be a best forest and conservation management practice in many countries and is mandatory in some areas.


Riparian buffers help to maintain water quality in waterways by protecting streams from non-point source pollution (e.g. from surrounding agricultural activities). Riparian vegetation cover prevents sediments, as well as such pollutants as nitrogen, phosphorus and others from entering water through biological (e.g. nutrient uptake by riparian vegetation) and physical-chemical (e.g. nutrient absorption for phosphorus which binds to clay particles and sediments) processes (Enanga et al. 2010).

Vegetation and tree roots also stabilize banks and prevent erosion. During flood events, riparian vegetation slows down runoff by absorbing excess water, reduces peak flow and helps to mitigate potential flood damage downstream (Colgan et al. 2013). Such buffer strips also yield benefits in agricultural areas, both by retaining sediment and nutrients from entering the waterways, thereby preventing water pollution, and maintaining soil productivity on the fields (Schmidt and Batker 2012). Some studies show that riparian buffers can help to reduce the amount of sediment reaching the streams by as much as 80 per cent (Crétaz and Barten 2007).

Trees also provide shade and reduce water temperature fluctuations, which is an important factor for the survival of many aquatic species. Shade provided by riparian vegetation also contributes to maintaining water quality, as high levels of light leads to increases in in-stream primary production, and can change the invertebrate species composition (Parkyn 2004). Increases in summer water temperatures can increase anoxia in stratified lakes, elevate the rate of phosphorus releases from lake and slow moving river sediments and cause algal blooms (Whitehead et al. 2009). Together with changes in actual water flows that affect riparian vegetation and water biota, the combined factors can impact on riparian food webs (Covich et al. 1999). A recent study in Denmark found that relatively short stretches (100–500 m) of riparian forest combat the negative effects of heating of stream water (Kristensen et al. 2013).


Depending on the extent and the type of vegetation in the riparian buffers, they can provide important biodiversity benefits. Vegetation provides biodiversity habitat for many species, that in some cases can be particularly beneficial for agricultural activities via insects and birds that facilitate pollination of the fields. The cover and shade also provide favourable conditions for birds and other animals that can take refuge in the buffer zones, and which use the riparian buffer zones as corridors for movement. This is important for pastoralist communities that often rest animals in riparian areas for watering, grazing and protection. Riparian vegetation, either designed or natural, is sometimes referred to as “shelterbelts” and offer shade and weather protection (due to cooling effects). They also reduce wind velocities, dust (including air pollutants) and erosion (Bird et al. 1992; Bird 1998; Heath et al. 1999).

In addition, riparian buffers can offer aesthetic and recreation value to nearby communities (Schmidt and Batker 2012). Drought, however, can weaken the resilience of intact riparian vegetation and larger forest ecosystems to pests and disease (Anderson 2008). The falling leaves and debris in turn provide food for aquatic species (Parkyn 2004). Moreover, water systems containing too many dead leaves and stored organic matter can become hypoxic, with decreased pH and fairly high concentrations of tannin and lignin, making the water toxic to fish and other aquatic species (Gehrke et al. 1993; Bond et al. 2008).


Costs associated with establishment and conservation of riparian buffer strips include land acquisition and any associated foregone economic opportunity, and when necessary, the planting of buffer zones. Where riparian land is on private property, public investment may need to be made for land acquisition or economic incentives for private landowners to establish riparian buffers.

Literature sources
Alexander, S. and McInnes, R. (2012). The benefits of wetland restoration. Ramsar Scientific and Technical Briefing Note No. 4. Ramsar Convention Secretariat, Gland, Switzerland.
Anderson, J. ed. (2008). Climate change-induced water stress and its impact on natural and managed ecosystems. Study for the European Parliament’s Temporary Committee on Climate Change. Available from
Bird, P.R. (1998). Tree windbreaks and shelter benefits to pastures in temperate grazing systems, Agroforestry Systems, vol. 41, 35-54.
Bird, P.R., Bicknell, D., Bulman, P.A., Burke, S.J.A., Leys, J.F., Parker, J.N., van der Sommen, F.J. and Voller, P. (1992). The role of shelter in Australia for protecting soils, plants and livestock, Agroforestry Systems, vol. 18, pp. 59-86.
Bond, N. R., Lake, P. S. and Arthington, A. H. (2008). The impacts of drought on freshwater ecosystems: an Australian perspective.  Hydrobiologia, vol. 600, pp. 3-16.
Colgan, C.S., Yakovleff, D. and Merrill, S.B. (2013). An Assessment of the Economics of Natural and Built Infrastructure for Water Resources in Maine. (May).
Covich, A.P., Palmer, M.A. and Crowl, T.A. (1999). The role of benthic invertebrate species in freshwater ecosystem, BioScience, vol. 49, pp. 119-127.
De la Crétaz, A. and Barten, P. K. (2007). Land Use Effects on Streamflow and Water Quality in the Northeastern United States. CRC Press.
Echavarria, M. (2002). Financing Watershed Conservation: The FONAG Water fund in Quito, Ecuador. In Selling Forest Environmental Services: Market-based Mechanisms for Conservation and Development, Pagiola, S., Bishop, J. and Landell-Mills, N., eds. London: Earthscan Publications.
Enanga E.M., Shivoga W.A., Maina-Gichaba C., Creed I.F. (2010). Observing Changes in Riparian Buffer Strip Soil Properties Related to Land Use Activities in the River Njoro Watershed, Kenya, Water Air Soil Pollution, vol. 218, pp. 587–601.
EPA (2012). United States Environmental Protection Agency, River Corridor and Wetland Restoration. Available from
Forslund, A. et al. (2009). Securing Water for Ecosystems and Human Well-being: The Importance of Environmental Flows. Swedish Water House Report 24. SIWI. Available from
Gehrke, P.C., Revell, M.B. and Philbey, A.W. (1993). Effects of river red gum, Eucalyptus camaldulensis, litter on golden perch, Macquaria ambigua, Journal of Fish Biology, vol. 43, pp. 265–279.
Harding, J. S.,Claassen, K. and Evers, N. (2006). Can forest fragments reset physical and waterquality conditions in agricultural catchments and act as refugia for forest stream invertebrates?, Hydrobiologia, vol. 568, pp. 391-402.
Heath, B.A., Maughan, J.A., Morrison, A.A., Eastwood, I.W., Drew, I.B. and Lofkin, M. (1999). The influence of wooded shelterbelts on the deposition of copper, lead and zinc at Shakerley Mere, Cheshire, England. The Science of the Total environment, vol. 235, No. 1-3, pp. 415-417. (September).
Nilsson, C. and Renöfält, B.M. (2008). Linking flow regime and water quality in rivers: a challenge to adaptive catchment management, Ecology and Society, vol. 13, No. 2, p. 18.
Russi, D., ten Brink, P., Farmer, A., Badura, T., Coates, D., Förster, J., Kumar, R. and Davidson, N. (2013). The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity for Water and Wetlands. IEEP, London and Brussels; Ramsar Secretariat, Gland, Switzerland.
Silva, J. P., Toland, J., Jones, W., Eldridge, J., Hudson, T., O’Hara, E. and Thévignot, C. (2010). LIFE building up Europe’s green infrastructure. Addressing connectivity and enhancing ecosystem functions, European Union.
Schmidt, R. and Batker, D. (2012). Nature’s Value in the McKenzie Watershed: A Rapid Ecosystem Service Valuation, Earth Economics. (May).
Parkyn S. (2004). Review of Riparian Buffer Zone Effectiveness, MAF Technical Paper No: 2004/05. (September).
Whitehead, P.G., Wilby, R.L., Batterbee, R.W., Kernan, M. and Wade, A.J. (2009). A review of the potential impacts of climate change on surface water quality. Hydrological Sciences, vol. 54, No. 1, pp. 101-123.
Measure category